World Oil Production
It is obviously important to know the
extent of the world's oil reserves, but it is equally important to know
the rate at which oil can be produced (pumped). All oil producing
countries of the world, save for one, produced oil at nearly the maximum
rate in 2003. That exception is Saudi Arabia. Both Iraq and Venezuela had
production interruptions in 2003 but world oil production stayed nearly
constant because Saudi Arabia made up the difference.
Saudi Arabia was able to significantly increase production on a short term
basis in 2003, but probably not in 2006 according to Matthew Simmons. (see the book
review section)
Oil
statistics usually include the ratio of reserves to production (R/P). It
would seem that this is a measure of how long the oil will last. This is
misleading because this assumes that production will remain constant until
the last drop is produced. Here is description of what really happens when
an oil field is discovered; At first, production grows exponentially as
each new well adds its output. Eventually production for the oil field
reaches a peak as each new well produces less oil and the older wells run
dry. Then there is an exponential decay as more and more wells run dry.
The productivity of a particular well depends on the rate at which oil
flows horizontally toward the well head, the pressure within the oil
bearing formation and the viscosity of the oil. There is an optimum
rate of production for any well. If oil is produced too fast, some of the oil is
left behind and the amount
ultimately produced is reduced. The productivity curve of the oil field
looks like a bell curve with the midpoint corresponding to the point when
half of the oil is gone.
M. King Hubbert, of Shell Oil, observed
this in 1956 and he used this information to predict a peak in production
in the U.S. in 1969. [1] His employer tried to
stop him from making his prediction and he was ridiculed. He missed by
only a year. It should be noted that the bell curve idea is mostly a rule of
thumb but it seems to work well. It works with oil but not with natural gas. It works so well that productivity curves
for oil fields, and even other things, are now called Hubbert
curves.
Here are some numbers from the Oil
& Gas Journal, Dec. 23, 2002. The interesting numbers are highlighted.
| |
Reserves
(bb) |
Production
(bb/year) |
R/P (years) |
Producing wells |
Production
(barrels/well/day) |
| Canada |
180 |
0.80 |
225 |
54061 |
41 |
| China |
18 |
1.24 |
15 |
72255 |
47 |
| Iran |
90 |
1.26 |
71 |
1120 |
3080 |
| Iraq |
112 |
0.74 |
152 |
1685 |
1204 |
| Kuwait |
94 |
0.58 |
162 |
790 |
2025 |
| Norway |
10 |
1.15 |
9 |
833 |
3782 |
| Russia |
60 |
2.70 |
22 |
41192 |
179 |
| Saudi Arabia |
259 |
2.69 |
96 |
1560 |
4730 |
| U.S. |
22 |
2.11 |
10 |
521070 |
11 |
| Venezuela |
78 |
0.88 |
88 |
15395 |
157 |
Canada had 6.5 billion barrels in
reserves in 2001 but now it has 180 billion barrels because of the
inclusion of tar sand, as mentioned earlier. Norway is a major producer
now but it passed the peak of the Hubbert curve in 200.
Productivity is now on the down sloping side of the bell. This is happening fast
as indicated by the an R/P of 9.
The U.S. is attempting to influence the
shape of the right side of the bell curve by drilling more than a half
million wells. But U.S. production is much less than the peak year of 1970
and the R/P of 10 means that the end is in sight. More wells and better
technology increases the rate of oil production. The total amount of oil
produced is increased only a little. But
the final plunge in production will be steeper. Compare the
productivity per well of the U.S. (11 barrels per day) with Saudi Arabia
(4730 barrels per day).
ROI (Return on Investment)
and EROEI (Energy Return on Energy Investment)

At 3782 barrels per day, Norway's oil
wells are highly productive. The productivity of each well must be high to
justify the enormous expense of drilling from platforms in the North
Sea. A major portion of the expense of drilling for oil in the North
Sea can be attributed to energy. It is possible to do the accounting in
money (ROI) or in energy (EROEI). It takes energy from coal
to make steel for the platform, pipes, etc. It takes energy from oil to
drill for oil, to mine coal, etc. When EROEI goes negative, it make
no sense to drill in the North Sea for energy. The oil might be valuable
for fertilizer or plastics, etc., but not for energy.

[1]
Hubbert's Peak, The Impending World Oil Shortage by Kenneth Deffeyes
is now in its 6th printing as of October 2003. Published in 2001 but now
available as a revised and updated paperback edition. The
"overview" is excellent.

|